Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532
Webbi) Shantabai v State of Bombay. The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1948, he. executed an unregistered document, that … Webb14 maj 2024 · Part -1 (Case analysis) Smt SHANTABAI v. STATE OF BOMBAY AIR 1958 SC 532 LegalKarona 1.29K subscribers Subscribe 2K views 2 years ago Amit kumar singh …
Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532
Did you know?
Webb3 mars 2024 · In the case of Smt.Shantabai v. State of Bombay [19], the court held that the right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is a benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. In the case of Anand Bahera v. Province of Orissa [20], it was held that profit emerging out of land is movable property. WebbTitagarh Paper Mills Company Limited AIR 1985 SC 1293. Right to enter upon land and cut trees is a benefit arising out of land - Shantabai V. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532. c. Congregation of buyers and sellers is enough to constitute a bazaar and the right to hold a bazaar is an interest in the land - Bibi Sayeeda v. State of Bihar (1996) 9 ...
Webb16 juli 2024 · Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Headnote Petn. No. 104 of 1957 decided on … WebbSMT. Shantabai vs state of Bombay (AIR 1958 SC 532) The court held that right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. Facts: By an unregistered document the husband of the petitioner granted her
WebbSmt. Shantabai v/s State of Bombay and Others Petition No. 104 of 1957 Decided On, 24 March 1958 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE S. R. DASS (CJI) By, … Webb1959 SCR 265 : AIR 1958 SC 532. In the Supreme Court of India (BEFORE SUDHI RANJAN DAS, C.J. AND T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR, SUDHANSHU KUMAR DAS, A.K. SARKAR …
Webb2 apr. 2016 · Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532: (1959) SCR 265 VIVIAN BOSE, J. - 8. The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1
WebbPETITIONER: SHRIMATI SHANTABAI Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF BOMBAY & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/03/1958 BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ) BENCH: DAS, … pho 2006 clovis ca menuWebb11 apr. 1991 · Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532, wherein while distinguishing “standing timber” and “tree” the...STC 116 : (1970) 1 SCC 611 : AIR 1971 SC 908, held that the standing... [1988] 68 STC 324 ( SC) : 1988 Supp SCC 232 : AIR 1988 SC 563... State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Murlidhar Mulamchand, Firm 12 Court: Madhya … pho 2000 worldgateWebb16 sep. 2016 · State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532) determining whether the tree is movable or immovable, the intention of the party is important if the parties intend that the tree should continue to have the benefit of further nutriment to be afforded by soil, the tree is immovable property. pho 1 woburn woburn mats version 2.1WebbCase Law PROPERTY. LAW Presentation RAINA DUA Case Details Case Name Shrimati Shantabai vs State of Bombay. Case 1958 AIR SC Citation 532. Court Supreme Court Facts The petitioners husband Balirambhau doye was a zamindar of Pandharpur . On 26t April 1948 he executed an unregistered document that called itself a lease in favor of his wife . pho20 furaffinyWebbi) Shantabai v State of Bombay The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1948, he executed an unregistered document, that called itself a lease, in favour of his wife, the petitioner. The deed gives her the right to enter upon certain areas in the zamindari in order to cut and take out pho 2012 anaheimWebbState of Bombay – AIR 1958 SC 532. This case was a landmark case that laid down the test to determine when timber trees are standing timber and when they are immovable … pho 2000 los angeles